An Indian newspaper (the India Times) recently reported on Obama’s position on job outsourcing.

More generally, what do the Presidential candidates say regarding employment in the USA?

There is a little to say about McCain’s position, for it does not differ from the traditional position of the Republican party: the best stimulus to a wealthy economy is a reduction in corporate income taxes; job creation will follow as a side effect of a wealthy economy. The basic assumption is that corporations are likely to reinvest a large percentage of the money saved in the US economy, thus creating jobs. Even if a part of these new jobs are created abroad, the vast majority is likely to happen in the USA.

Barack Obama has a different approach. First, I found his acknowledgment of the situation very realistic. During a speech in Raleigh, he said, “We live in a competitive world, and that is a fact that cannot be reversed.” […] Revolutions in communications and technology have sent jobs wherever there is an Internet connection, that has forced children in Raleigh or Boston to compete for those jobs with children in Bangalore or Beijing.”

It might sound like stating the obvious, but based on the comments I receive on this blog, not all people yet realize that we cannot reverse a process we have created.

And the Democratic candidate to elaborate on his ideas to help job creation: “We need to invest in the research and innovation necessary to create jobs and industries of the future right here in the US.” […] “And one place where that investment would make an enormous difference is in a renewable energy policy that ends our addiction on foreign oil, provides real, long-term relief from high gas prices and high fuel costs, and builds a green economy that could create up to five million well-paying jobs that can’t be outsourced.”

Obama believes that the US “can also create millions of new jobs by rebuilding our schools, roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure that needs repair.”

While I understand McCain’s reasoning, I believe it is going to take more than another tax cut to stimulate job creation here in the USA. In the IT industry, for instance, the shortage of talents is a more important reason to go offshore, certainly more than the cost savings, and I assume there are many industries facing the same challenge.

The USA need to recreate the conditions for creating jobs inshore. It includes a renovated infrastructure, more graduate engineers, and a focus on renewable energies, as Obama rightly pointed out.

“This nation has faced such fundamental change before. And each time, we’ve kept our economy strong and competitive by making the decision to expand opportunity outward, to grow our middle class, to invest in innovation, and most importantly, to invest in the education and well-being of our workers.”

A beautiful conclusion for this post.

The full article from the India Times is accessible online.

Remi
www.outsourcing-vsc.com


Sphere: Related Content

  • Share/Bookmark

Email This Post Email This Post


9 Responses to “What Obama And McCain Say About Job Outsourcing”

What McCain is trying to do is please the corporate lordships to gain support.

Outsourcing is now a business reality, and you’re right, it cannot be reversed.

Obama is making more sense here.

I agree the process cannot be reverse and it shouldn’t be reverse either.

Competition has always favored growth and that is the way it should remain.

This is toss up of 2 different set of principles. It’s more like a cache-22 if you’d ask me.

On regards with this, I’d say it’s more important to clean you own backyard first before cleaning some else backyard.

Patriotically wise, American locals should be given priority but you see business decisions has several elements to consider and if you are talking about cutting cost (all that financial talk) then outsourcing is much better.

Thing is why help others first when your locals needs your help?Yes?

Canidates generally don’t say what they really want–McCain is part of that group. The Republican party has for, for the past 30 years or so, not decreased taxes for the blue collar worker.

As to Obama, no one really knows what he wants. Lately he has been doing a lot of backtracking on comments earlier made and hasn’t shown that he can stand up for what he believes (or at least, what he says).

Overall, it just looks like we are going to spend another 4 years wishing we voted for the Libertarian or Green party.

Outsourcing ,or really the transfer of jobs and industries from the US to other countries, is not going to be reversed. The US might find ways to create new jobs, but they are not going to be IT/Computer Science jobs. The declining enrollments in computer science reflect this reality – the labor market at work! I spoke the other night with an MBA student and she expects to find a job paying in excess of 90K per year at graduation. She claimed that was the average starting salary for 2006 for all MBA graduates.

Apart from IT services, recently US has also started off shoring their work regarding patents to India. If IT services cannot be reversed, do you think, this relatively new field, IP services, will be effected ?

Bikram,

I am not an expert of this question, but I do not see why US companies would not offshore some of their legal services. That said, and because of the sensitivity of the subject, I can see a lot of reluctance in moving this process abroad. And if such a decision is made I suppose that India will have serious competition from some Caribbean islands for instance.

I am living this as my job will soon be gone of 12 years due to outsourcing. Outsourcing is a huge problem in the US and needs controlled. I don’t see companies looking for more talent as the problem. It is the almighty dollar driving this and companies are cheap. If they can find a way to save they will do it. There is no respect for the employees in America anymore and THAT NEEDS TO CHANGE. From what I can see the only candidate doing anything on this is Obama. Companies do not need to be praised for giving our jobs away. They need to keep the jobs in the US and stop supporting other countries.

In a country like the US, years of litigation can bleed a client and getting all the work done at one’s own law firm can exhaust the ambitious law professional. Now there is a solution called legal outsourcing that has come around for a few years and the demand for it is increasing because it creates a win win win situation (for the lawyer, the client, and the offshore service provider).

Something to say?

Sphere: Related Content